On 8/18/20 5:33 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 10:03:38PM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 01:47:26PM -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/18/20 1:24 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
/usr/include/c++/10.2.0/bits/atomic_base.h:152:12: note: declaration of 'struct
std::atomic<double>'
152 | struct atomic;
| ^~~~~~
make[2]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/inkscape_base.dir/build.make:5120:
src/CMakeFiles/inkscape_base.dir/ui/tool/node.cpp.o] Error 1
Note the 'Cached relative error' comment.
After some random searches without any relevant results, I
eventually discovered that boost has a concept of a 'relative
error'.
But I'm guessing this might be the first time anybody has tried to
build inkscape with boost-1.74.0. No idea how to fix it.
ĸen
Hi Ken,
I have a fix in my sandbox right now rendering
You'll want to add "#include <atomic>" either above or below "#include
<iostream>". I've read conflicting reports about this regarding Boost,
glibc, and gcc. I was able to build it with Poppler before freeze, so I know
it's not that. I attributed it to glibc in my sandbox. This is the sed I
entered:
sed -i '/#include <iostream>/a #include <atomic>' src/ui/tool/node.cpp
- Doug
Thanks!
I couldn't find any directly relevant results, I think gcc had not
changed since my last build, so from the odd comment in the message
I guessed boost.
Will give it a try when I'm back at the machine.
Works nicely (as in builds and runs, but I'm too inexpert to get it
to do what I really would like to use it for ;-). Thanks again.
You're welcome! I'm glad it helped :-)
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
