When building samba with required and recommended and dependencies (but without dbus installed) on a SysV machine, I get (configure output): ----------------- [...] VFS_STATIC: vfs_default,vfs_not_implemented,vfs_posixacl VFS_SHARED: vfs_recycle,vfs_audit,vfs_extd_audit,vfs_full_audit,vfs_fake_perms,vfs_ default_quota,vfs_readonly,vfs_cap,vfs_expand_msdfs,vfs_shadow_copy,vfs _shadow_copy2,vfs_readahead,vfs_xattr_tdb,vfs_streams_xattr,vfs_streams _depot,vfs_acl_xattr,vfs_acl_tdb,vfs_preopen,vfs_catia,vfs_media_harmon y,vfs_unityed_media,vfs_fruit,vfs_shell_snap,vfs_commit,vfs_worm,vfs_cr ossrename,vfs_linux_xfs_sgid,vfs_time_audit,vfs_offline,vfs_virusfilter ,vfs_widelinks,vfs_snapper,vfs_fake_acls,vfs_nfs4acl_xattr,vfs_error_in ject,vfs_delay_inject,vfs_syncops,vfs_dirsort,vfs_fileid,vfs_aio_fork,v fs_aio_pthread,vfs_gpfs,vfs_btrfs,vfs_glusterfs_fuse PDB_STATIC: pdb_smbpasswd,pdb_tdbsam,pdb_ldapsam PDB_SHARED: AUTH_STATIC: auth_builtin,auth_sam,auth_winbind,auth_unix AUTH_SHARED: NSS_INFO_STATIC: nss_info_template NSS_INFO_SHARED: CHARSET_STATIC: CHARSET_SHARED: IDMAP_STATIC: idmap_tdb,idmap_passdb,idmap_nss,idmap_ldap IDMAP_SHARED: idmap_ad,idmap_rfc2307,idmap_autorid,idmap_rid,idmap_hash,idmap_tdb2,id map_script GPEXT_STATIC: GPEXT_SHARED: PERFCOUNT_STATIC: PERFCOUNT_SHARED: RPC_STATIC: rpc_mdssvc_module RPC_SHARED: Checking for dbus : not found vfs_snapper is enabled but prerequisite dbus-1 package not found. Use - -with-shared-modules=!vfs_snapper to disable vfs_snapper support. (complete log in /sources/samba/samba-4.13.0/bin/config.log) ----------------------------------- Note that "vfs_snapper" is in the long list after "VFS_SHARED:"
This does not show up in systemd, and in my usual builds, I build dbus earlyn so it does not show up either. This time I have randomized the order of the requested packages (before running the blfs-tools dependency resolver), so it happens that samba is built before dbus. Owing to the fact that vfs_snapper may be disabled (see above), I'd add dbus to the recommended dependencies (only for SysV, of course). Is there a reason to either: - not do that - add it to required? Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
