On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 05:29:53PM -0600, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote: > > On 1/5/21 4:20 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 07:50:14PM +0000, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:33:30AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > On 1/5/21 9:34 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 02:33:35PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via > > > > > blfs-dev wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 18:21 +0000, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > Just checking all packages, the following are present: > > > > > > Replying with the state of play before Pierre had identified that > > using -i is what can cause gtkdocize to be required (i.e. for > > packages which mention gtk-doc if I understood correctly) : > > > > > > networking/netprogs/cifsutils.xml: autoreconf -fiv > > I guess my mail to Doug got treated as spam, as will this one. > > There seems to be a perfectly usable configure script in all > > versions of cifs-utils that have been in the book since this > > autoreconf was added - I have not tried to run autoreconf on this. > > Unfortunately I can't find it in my spam folder over in GMail either :-( > > Yeah the autoreconf command can go from cifs-utils. There was a broken > release of (6.9?), which later had a stealth release that restored the > proper behavior. 6.9 (Broken) didn't ship with a pregenerated configure > file. > > I'll get it at my next commit, unless you get to it first :-) > > - Doug >
Thanks for the explanation, keeping track of where there was a stealth update which we fixed seems quite hard. I'm not likely to commit any of this soon. ĸen -- Lu-Tze had long considered that everything happens for a reason, except possibly football. -- The Thief Of Time -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
