On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 09:16:36PM +0000, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 09:07:34PM +0000, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 10:39:05AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > > > On 1/31/21 7:57 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > > > > Perhaps add Date: xxxx Severity: Critical/High/Uncertain in the > > header on the *consolidated* page? And I suppose on the header in > > 10.0.html. Of the items currently there, I think only that for > > Samba is Critical. > > > Severity should be: Critical/High/Moderate/Uncertain > ^^^^^^^^ > > > For date format separators, I've used '/' : does that look odd in > > CCMM-YY-DD formats ? I can change it before I go too far. > > > I've just seen a Romanian poster using dd.mm.ccyy (with dots) to > refer to when something happened, I guess that '/' is not universal > and 'ccyy-mm-dd' is generally understood. Will change them. > Apparently I made the decision around a day or so ago to use the ISO date format instead of CCYY/MM/DD. Getting enough sleep would be nice ;-)
More relevantly, I've added dates and severity ratings in the headers for each item. Where details were subsequently changed I've changed 'Date:' to 'Updated:' (so far, only Thunderbird, 10.0 014). Who would have thought that so many of the updates during September were rated as Critical (on the CVE details, and/or by upstreams) ? ĸen -- The right of the people to keep and arm Bears, shall not be infringed. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
