On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 09:36:16PM +0200, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: > On Sun, 2021-03-28 at 18:42 +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 04:16:33PM +0100, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > > In theory plugins should have been working for years, and nothing in > > > that area has changed, but exceot for icewm I don't use lto because > > > packages that should benefit from the longer build (mozilla > > > packages) get rebuilt monthly and the extra build time seems a > > > waste. > > > > Looks as if my script broke at some point in the past: > > liblto_plugin.so points to > > /usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu//liblto_plugin.so > > which of course does not exist. > > > > So I get to keep both the pieces ;-) Thanks for the diagnostics, > > they do not alter my views about unnecessarily using cmake, but I > > guess I'm in a minority on that. > > While doing research about that problem, I found one of the issues where the > reporter was having a problem during build, and was using autotools. The > maintainer advised him to use cmake, so it seems to be upstream choice. > > Pierre >
Thanks. Initially the cmake build was less tested, which was why Bruce had to use the LTO option. Sad. The cmake and glibc warnings are annoying, but I've now updated the latest build, and one of my 10.1 systems, and icewm-2.2.1 is working ok. ĸen -- On average, the Panda feeds for 15 hours a day. This is the same as an adult at home under quarantine, which is why we call it a "Pandemic". -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
