Matthias B. wrote: > On Wed, 4 May 2005 22:26:41 +0100 (BST) Ken Moffat > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Worst case, I guess you might have to build a 3.3 gcc (3.3.4 or 3.3.5) >> and use that to build 2.95.3. > > It's worse than that. The C++ components of gcc 2.95 don't compile with > recent glibcs.
That's just FUD. http://www.diy-linux.org/pipermail/diy-linux-dev/2005-January/000285.html -- Alexander E. Patrakov -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
