Dr. Edgar Alwers wrote these words on 05/17/05 16:13 CST:
> And it is my feeling, that security issues, as necessary they
> might be, are creating a lot of additional problems in the day by day use of 
> linux, at least in an home environment. I would like to exchange oppinions on 
> this issue also.

Just to provide an opposite view, for the sake of discussion, I use
PAM with absolutely no issues whatsoever. For the record, I try to
utilize PAM in all applications which will use it, and here's the
/etc/pam.d/other file I use (as restrictive as possible):

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/BLFS > cat /etc/pam.d/other
# File: /etc/pam.d/other

auth            required        pam_deny.so
auth            required        pam_warn.so

account         required        pam_deny.so

session         required        pam_deny.so

password        required        pam_deny.so
password        required        pam_warn.so

Now, that said, in a home environment you probably don't need to use
PAM for security.

-- 
Randy

rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686]
16:19:00 up 45 days, 15:52, 2 users, load average: 0.04, 0.02, 0.00
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to