I'm curious as I was recently considering replacing an existing
sendmail based system and given the pain of setting it up the first time
I'm considering alternatives.
What is the downside of qmail? Why the "all or nothing" philosophy?
I'm looking for something that I can easily deal with virtual users on
multiple domains, starttls (which I understand is the way to go for remote
authentication while travelling), imap, and to a lesser degree pop.
According to the webpages I read qmail seemed to be well regarded (especially
for
a hacker proof arch), what am I missing?
Thanks
Steve
S. Anthony Sequeira wrote:
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 18:16, Declan Moriarty wrote:
There's always Qmail
/ducks :-)
Darn, missed, keep still that target :)
My philosophy is with DJB's stuff is all or nothing, so far nothing. I have
tried out his DNS effort, and his services stuff (like the idea), but decided
it's not for me.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
