Randy McMurchy wrote: > S. Anthony Sequeira wrote these words on 11/07/05 15:44 CST: > >> The SF CVS version needed a patch to include stdlib.h in one of it's >> files. > > Hmmm... I didn't have to apply a patch last time I installed it, > but then I could have patched my copy I pulled down and then created > a tarball, in which case I wouldn't need the patch any longer. And > since that was back in May when I created the tarball, I cannot > remember if I did have to create a patch. But I take your word that > you did. :-)
Details on application, came up with a malloc error on the make, google gave me the answer. >> OK, but be aware I'm using BLFS 6.1, therefore GNOME 2.10, is it still >> usefull >> to you? And you'll have to bear with me. I need some sleep. I also >> need to >> install SVN first. I'll report as soon as I can > > Yes, it would be useful. And there's no rush. In fact, don't install > SVN just for this, unless you want to, of course. Any help would be > appreciated. OK, I'll come back when I've done it. I've got lots of disk space, though not as much time. And SVN may turn out to be useful after all. And darn this kmail client (usefull indeed), I really miss Evolution's spell checking. RSN, I will be able to come off this extremely slow laptop backup and onto my brand new 6.1 B/LFS installation. Regards. -- When I met th'POPE back in '58, I scrubbed him with a MILD SOAP or DETERGENT for 15 minutes. He seemed to enjoy it ... -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
