DJ Lucas wrote:
Just for reference:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] xbug]# ls /tools/packages-gcc4/glibc-*
/tools/packages-GCC4-6748/glibc-2.3.5-fix_test-1.patch
/tools/packages-GCC4-6748/glibc-2.3.5-gcc4_fix_elf-1.patch
/tools/packages-GCC4-6748/glibc-2.3.5-gcc4_fix_iconvdata-1.patch
/tools/packages-GCC4-6748/glibc-2.3.5-gcc4_fix_string-1.patch
/tools/packages-GCC4-6748/glibc-2.3.5-gcc4_fix_symbols-1.patch
/tools/packages-GCC4-6748/glibc-2.3.5.tar.bz2
/tools/packages-GCC4-6748/glibc-linuxthreads-2.3.5.tar.bz2
Gerard are you using glibc-2.3.4? A 'partial' fix is in glibc-2.3.5
Yes, I am.
which could explain why I do not see the problem. I don't understand
why, but the complete 'fix' as shown in the bug reports, changes only
one line for glibc-2.3.5. sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c, in line 75, change
the assert to an if. The rest looks to be indentation.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=61823
I'm confused as to the fix for all this now.
I should upgrade to Glibc-2.3.5. Which patch(es) should be applied? The
one in the attachment above (id 61823)? Or the patches you listed from
your /tools/packages-gcc4/ directory?
The LFS book installs Glibc-2.3.6. No patches mentioned in the LFS book.
Would that version work too as a drop-in replacement for my 2.3.4 and
skip this 2.3.5 version we're talking about?
--
Gerard Beekmans
/* If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem */
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
