Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 01/17/06 18:37 CST: > I think it's more accurate because it narrows the regex to what we > actually want. It just so happens that there's no other instances of > " enum" in the file. But, that's just semantics.
Right. So let's just drop that part of it. I just don't know how something that works replaced with something that works, is "more" accurate. They both do the same exact thing. The above, of course, has nothing to do with its repeatability. And as I said, your suggestion is much better because it can be repeated without issue. But that doesn't make it "more accurate". :-) > Anyway, could you check the syntax before you commit? Oh, of course. But, knowing sed, syntactically, it was correct. Making sure spaces are matched properly is trivial. BTW, I didn't mention it earlier, thanks for the suggestion. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 18:38:00 up 115 days, 4:02, 3 users, load average: 0.12, 0.22, 0.44 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
