On 3/3/06, Lord Igtenio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Is /tools still in your path? What's the output of `which gcc` or if > >you don't have which, `type -p gcc`? Do you have the symlink > >/usr/bin/cc -> /usr/bin/gcc? > > > >If you actually are using /usr/bin/gcc and the above output is from > >that, then there are issues. My guess in this situation is that the > >spec file adjustment in Ch. 6.13 did not go correctly. > > Yes, /tools/bin is in my PATH. I then removed it, and it booted fine. > 'type -p gcc' shows, before removing /tools/bin from my path: > > /tools/bin/gcc > > Afterwards, it's: > /usr/bin/gcc
You had /tools/bin at the front of your path? > Do you think I'll still need to recompile everything, if it was solely using > /tools before and now it's (Apparently) set to /usr? If you just had /tools/bin at the front of your path, then jhalfs almost assuredly didn't do this. In that case, this setting was probably done after jhalfs completed. In which case everything done by jhalfs is fine. However, everything you've done since then is not guaranteed to work. In fact I would certainly rebuild glib if not everything. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
