Henry christenson wrote these words on 03/28/06 20:06 CST:
Me using gcc 4 thought i wouldent need the patch because
of the way its mentioned in the book.
Thanks for the input, though I'm not really sure there's anything
we'll do about it. The way it is mentioned in the book is:
"Required patch: ..."
I'm not sure what there is we can do to make it more clear that it
is a required patch. The name of the patch should be irrelevant. I
suppose the description part of the patch header could be updated,
but that, to me, is secondary to the book saying that it is a
"required patch".
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686]
20:21:01 up 3 days, 8:58, 6 users, load average: 0.29, 0.12, 0.19
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
