On 3/30/07, anirudh vij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hmm....if i strip libraries,will i be able to debug linked progs(of my own)?
You would be able to debug your own programs, but these are all linked to this libraries and so your debug info would be useless. But i think you could strip the binaries :) Tijnema > > On 3/30/07, anirudh vij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > sorry for the last empty mail.i pressed the send button inadvertently. > > right now /usr is 1.7 gigs./home is 0.3 gigs,and other misc total to > > around 0.7 gig. > > i was surprised to see the size of the /proc partition.this was around > > 850mb.Is this what we expect? > > > > > > On 3/30/07, anirudh vij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 3/30/07, anirudh vij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > the packages i was talking about are ITK(see itk.org) and VTK(see > > > > vtk.org).ITK when compiled with examples alone takes more than 1.3 > > > > gigs of space. > > > > > > > > On 3/30/07, Tijnema ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 3/30/07, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:16:30PM +0530, anirudh vij wrote: > > > > > > > hi, > > > > > > > i have a blfs system running on a 5 gig partition.around 2.5 gigs > > > are > > > > > used up. > > > > > > > i am installing some packages that will take up about 1.7 gigs of > > > > > > > additional space. > > > > > > > so i wanted to add a new 12 gig partition to the system.this 12 > > gig > > > > > > > partition is currently mounted as /home under ubuntu. > > > > > > > how should i do this? > > > > > > > if it can be done ,can i put the /home of blfs on it? > > > > > > > no valuable data exists on the 12 gig partition currently. > > > > > > Apart from what has already been said, consider where space is > > > > > > currently being used. If it's in /var/log, rotate the logs > > > > > > regularly. If it's in /home, it's easy enough to move that to a > > > > > > different partition (and usually beneficial - you can then upgrade > > > > > > the system to yet another '/' partition without losing the data). > > > > > > > > > > > > What concerns me is packages that will take 1.7 GB - not > > > > > > impossible, but the biggest gnome package I have is gnumeric (50.5MB > > > > > > net space for 64-bit) and even the big kde packages are well under > > > > > > 100MB net - I keep /home (and /boot for x86 and x86_64) separately, > > > > > > and everything else fits in to 4GB partitions. > > > > > > > > > > > > ĸen > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, packages are not that big, unless you're talking about games (or > > > > > dedicated gameservers). I installed a hell lot of packages(Guess > > > > > around 500), including KDE/QT/X. Total disk space used: about 2GB > > > > > I also keep the sources + build which take 10GB of space. So if you > > > > > don't save your sources+build dirs, you don't really need more > > > > > space... > > > > > > > > > > Also you could strip out libraries and programs. See the LFS book for > > > > > more info about stripping. > > > > > > > > > > Tijnema > > > > > > -- > > > > > > das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce > > > > > > -- > > > > > > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support > > > > > > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > > > > > > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > > > > -- > > > > > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support > > > > > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > > > > > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > > > > > > > > > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
