Am Montag, den 14.05.2007, 22:40 +1200 schrieb Simon Geard: > On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 22:47 +0200, Olaf Grüttner wrote: > > As far as I can tell this url contains the latest headers. > > http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~mmazur/linux-libc-headers/ > > linux-libc-headers-2.6.12.0.tar.bz2 is the latest unless some headers > > from cvs are required. I am not sure if taking cvs-headers gives unexpected > > other problems ? ... > > That project has been unmaintained for a while now, which resulted in > the kernel developers providing the equivalent headers as part of the > kernel source tree itself. If you look at LFS SVN, you'll see that it > uses these headers rather than the linux-libc-headers package. > > > As for your errors in building hal 0.5.7.1, the problem is that it uses > the dbus_connection_disconnect function, which was present (but > deprecated) in older versions of dbus, and was removed in the 1.0 > release. From memory, patching hal to use the correct functions is > fairly trivial, though I don't recall the exact change. Hopefully > someone else on the list will know it. > > Simon.
Interesting, I am coming closer ... I am using dbus-1.0.2, the most recent version I found. I thought, that dbus was the only requirement, but some package required dbus-glib. I thought that dbus would build dbus-glib itself during the "make" process, but it seems that the extra package dbus-glib was needed. I will look out for the patches, thanks for the info. Do you by chance know, if I can download a recent kernel and use the provided kernel-headers, even if I installed kernel headers according to the lfs-6.2 instructions? Or will I mess up stuff later on in the building of other packages? Olaf -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
