On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 00:50 +0100, taipan67 wrote: > Can anybody who's used similar methods highlight the pro's & con's of > either alternative from their own experience, please?
I use the LD_PRELOAD approach - the installation is done as normal, save that the 'make install' command is wrapped by a program called installwatch which logs what the install did. It doesn't handle file *changes*, but allows newly created files to be removed. Works well enough for me... Simon.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
