> I read in your previous mail you have an audio workstation. > > May I ask you if you know about softwares like Sibelius
afaik, that's a notation software? i never use notation software, sorry... :) > or Steinberg Cubase SX cubase is too huge piece of software, and no one utilises 100% of its features, but some subset for one's personal needs :) as for me, i'm happy with MusE (http://www.muse-sequencer.org/), since it has Midi Transformator - a clone of cubase's Logical Editor, and i have really hard use of this feature in my work. but your needs & expectations may totally differ, and it's likely they do :) > and/or libraries like the ones of Native Instruments? do you mean sample libraries? if you do, i'm sorry again, but can't tell you anything intersting, since i'm absolutely harry with software synthesis for doing my psy and dub stuff :) > Don't tell me about Brahms 'cause it's not worthy. +1 :) > Sibelius, Steinberg and Native Instruments products are steps higher; > these are softwares I normally use (running Mac OS X and Windows > machines), they are surely a money investment but worthy. +1 for mac, but...... ...... it all depends of what kind of work one is doing with audio. i had an experience of studio work on mac, and it is excellent for that. but if we talk about live performance with software-synthesized instruments - nothing can outperform a well tuned linux system at the moment :) -- sex, freeride, open source! -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
