Leo Peschier napisał(a): > juras wrote: >> "... gcc4.2 is what the architectural defaults are built for, and >> previous versions are likely to hurt your performance ..." > > Googling your quote leads to the ATLAS website. You might consider to try the That is right. I'm trying to compile ATLAS and LAPAK and then GSL and Octave. I have already upgraded the compiler and the system seems to be working without any glitches but, who knows... So now I have gcc-4.2.2 and I am reading on about ATLAS, LAPAK and friends.
> gotoblas as your optimised BLAS instead. I followed that road with gcc-4.1.2. > You will still need a Fortran compiler (I used gcc-4.1.2 gfortran). Thank you for the information about gotoblas. The optimization seems to be extended in comparison with ATLAS. I hope I will be able to assess and compare their performance. > Leo. juras -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
