On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 05:14:15PM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:06:45AM -0600, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> 
> > It may  be a  bug, but one  in the  LFS-6.1 version of  gcc (3.4.3),
> > which is very  old.  You may have to do  incremental upgrades to get
> > up to a version of gcc that is able to compile 4.2.1.
> 
> I built LFS-6.3  on top of LFS-6.1.1 without  any problem so upgrading
> gcc 3.4.3 to 4.1.2 is fine (AFAICT).  Has anyone done 4.1.2 to 4.2.1?
> 
> Regards, 
> 
> Jeremy Henty 
 Loads of times, while 4.2.1 was still current, using both LFS and
CLFS - in each case following the book (so, new binutils and new
glibc each time).

ĸen
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to