On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:10:02PM +1300, Simon Geard wrote: > On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 22:19 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > > I haven't actually tried this, but you can also just grab the > > xulrunner tarball: > > > > http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/xulrunner/releases/ > > > > FWIW, I'm pretty sure fedora builds xulrunner from these tarballs and > > not from the firefox source. But there's probably not a lot of > > difference since they're just different branches of the same code. > > Yes you can, which is what the Slackware build I copied was doing. But > if you're building Firefox itself anyway, there's not really much point > in having separate tarballs - the xulrunner included with Firefox 3.0.3 > is the same 1.9.0.3 version available standalone.
A very late follow-up to this: the xulrunner-1.9.0.3 and firefox-3.0.3-source tarballs are *identical*. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
