On Friday 02 January 2009 08:02:12 pm b-vol wrote:
> On Thursday 01 January 2009 09:21:56 pm Ken Moffat wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 08:03:49PM +0000, b-vol wrote:
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > >
> > > I seem to be running into a jam  compiling xine-lib-1.1.15  (see below)
> > >
> > > ###compiling xine-lib-1.1.15 (host:-  AMD-64-box  (64-bit linux(clfs)
> > > Kernel 2.6.27.7, gcc-4.3.2)) (patch from cblfs  site applied
> > > successfully)
> >
> >  How do you download that patch ?  I can see its name referenced
> > there, but I can't find a link.  I'll accept replies off-list, since
> > it's slightly OT here.
> >
> > > compiler  spew:-#######################
> > >
> > > In file included from ../../src/xine-engine/xine_internal.h:33,
> > >                  from image.c:47:
> > > ../../include/xine.h:2230: warning: 'xine_tvsystem' is deprecated
> > > image.c: In function 'image_decode_data':
> > > image.c:113: error: implicit declaration of function
> > > 'MagickGetImagePixels' image.c:113: warning: nested extern declaration
> > > of 'MagickGetImagePixels' make[2]: ***
> > > [xineplug_decode_image_la-image.lo] Error 1
> >
> >  I'm guessing it's a problem with your version of ImageMagick (which
> > has to be the package with the fastest releases).  On x86 I used
> > 6.4.4-1.
> >
> > ĸen
>
> the ImageMagick   is now  upgraded to  ImageMagick-6.4.8-3  (there was no
> 6.4.4-1  on the ImageMagick  site).  Compiling xine-lib-1.15  seems to
> bypass the ImageMagick glitch but it now responds with:-
>
>
> #for unpatched sources:-
>
> In file included from ../../../src/xine-engine/xine_internal.h:33,
>                  from ff_audio_decoder.c:41:
> ../../../include/xine.h:2230: warning: 'xine_tvsystem' is deprecated
> In file included from ../../../src/input/input_plugin.h:29,
>                  from ../../../src/xine-engine/xine_internal.h:35,
>                  from ff_audio_decoder.c:41:
> ../../../src/xine-engine/buffer.h:679: warning: return type defaults to
> 'int' ff_audio_decoder.c: In function 'ff_audio_decode_data':
> ff_audio_decoder.c:272: error: 'AVCodecContext' has no member
> named 'bits_per_sample'
> ff_audio_decoder.c:325: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'avcodec_decode_audio'
> ff_audio_decoder.c:325: warning: nested extern declaration
> of 'avcodec_decode_audio'
> ff_audio_decoder.c:330: error: 'AVCodecContext' has no member
> named 'bits_per_sample'
> make[3]: *** [xineplug_decode_ff_la-ff_audio_decoder.lo] Error 1
>
>
> ###for patched sources (the patched is:-
> xine-lib-1.1.15-HEADERFIX-1.patch  downloadable from
> http://cblfs.cross-lfs.org/index.php/Xine_Libraries):-
>
>
>
> ineplug_decode_ff_la-ff_audio_decoder.o
> In file included from ../../../src/xine-engine/xine_internal.h:33,
>                  from ff_audio_decoder.c:41:
> ../../../include/xine.h:2230: warning: 'xine_tvsystem' is deprecated
> ff_audio_decoder.c: In function 'ff_audio_decode_data':
> ff_audio_decoder.c:272: error: 'AVCodecContext' has no member
> named 'bits_per_sample'
> ff_audio_decoder.c:325: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'avcodec_decode_audio'
> ff_audio_decoder.c:325: warning: nested extern declaration
> of 'avcodec_decode_audio'
> ff_audio_decoder.c:330: error: 'AVCodecContext' has no member
> named 'bits_per_sample'
> make[3]: *** [xineplug_decode_ff_la-ff_audio_decoder.lo] Error 1
>
> helpful suggestions will be appreciated
>
> lux-integ
>
> > --
> > das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
>
Today I got hold of xine-lib-1.1.16 (just released)  and it compiled and 
installed trouble-free.  Thanks for all your help  and hope this is of use to 
x86_64  (64bit  users)    

>
> ###################################
> “Common sense teaches that booksellers should not speculate in hops,
> or bankers in turpentine; that railways should not be promoted by maiden
> ladies, or canals by beneficed clergymen ....”
> Walter Bagehot-economist: 1826-1877


-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to