>
> I would _think_ that cron jobs would still be desired in run level 2,
> and bow out gracefully on failure due to missing network, but I'm
> honestly not sure what the specs say on it. If cron _is_ expected in
> RL2, then run-parts must be in /sbin, not /usr/sbin.
>
> HTH
>
> -- DJ Lucas
>
I see your point and I did wonder if /usr/bin was the best place.
Perhaps /bin would be better. run-parts is not really a system admin type
program and I could see it being useful for ordinary users.
Andy
_________________________________________________________________
Free photo editing software from Windows Live . Try it now!
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/134665240/direct/01/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
