On Tuesday 21 April 2009 01:04:06 am Ken Moffat wrote: > > > ####### > > MING flags are -I/usr/local/include > > MING libs are -L/usr/local/lib -lz -lm -lgif -lpng -lming > > MING version code is 00040200 > > MAKESWF is /usr/local/bin/makeswf > > MTASC is /usr/local > > MTASC CLASSPATH is /usr/share/ocaml/mtasc/std > > HAXE is /usr/local > > HAXE CLASSPATH is /usr/share/haxe/ > > SWFMILL is /usr/local/bin/swfmill > > SWFC is /usr/local/bin/swfc > > I suspect none of the above are necessary, but it's a while since I > read the descriptions of them (and since I only have a 50% success > rate with you-tube videos, perhaps some of them are useful).
I read these were the gnash 'dependencies' from bumf in the gnash tarball. > > XPCOM flags are: > > -I/opt/firefox-3.0.5/include/firefox-3.0.5/unstable XPCOM libs > > are: -L/opt/firefox-3.0.5/lib/firefox-devel-3.0.5/sdk/lib -lxpcomglue_s > > -lnspr4 -lplds4 > > Unrelated to the gnash problem, but you need to keep abreast of > firefox updates. And yes, I know I've kept quiet about 3.0.8 for > the -dev book, but at least the book does now point to where to > look for vulnerabilities, and also mentions about using the ff > tarball to build xulrunner. > yes I have looked at firefox 3.07 and 3.08 and very much want to upgrade but I have gtk2.14.3 and this need upgrading too (from what I read on blfs). Rather that surgery on the present build, I was planning to use it to iron-ourt some wrinkles before a major update including clfs-current-dev using kernel 2.6.29, gcc-4.3.3 , glibc-2.9 etc later one. (Mind you this too will have is own set of wrinkles) > > I _think_ the error was just *before* "referenced in section". All > I can see from what you posted is that something in Machine.o within > .libs/libgnashvm.a is defined in a "discarded section". > > Have you looked at what is in fedora (fc-11) ? Or gentoo ? no not yet but thanks for the tip and wil do . > The error might be from binutils (clfs patches aggressively from > upstream), but if that was the case I would have expected similar > errors to show up a long time before you got to this part of your > build, so I think that is unlikely. > > ĸen > -- > das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
