On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 02:39 -0400, Dominic Ringuet wrote: > About the same topic, I wonder if this bug should be reported to the > gcc or mozilla folks. If gcc 4.3.X works fine, I doubt mozdev folks > will get that problem on their shoulders. Add to that if some distros > got both seamonkey and gcc 4.4.0 working right; the problem may be > only LFS related.
It has been reported to them, as per the link William provided [1]. I don't think they're interested in dealing with it immediately though, being focused heavily on the Firefox 3.5 release... Additionally, downloaded binaries *do* work correctly, so even if it can't be built with gcc-4.4, it can run just fine under it. Simon. [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496706
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
