Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 07/14/09 00:25 CST: > BLFS is woefully out of date. HAL-0.5.9.1 is two years old.
I've cc'd -dev so please respond to this email to that list. I will take responsibility for BLFS being so out-of-date. HAL was my very next update to do before things have just gone crazy in my life. I own many tickets, most of which I had full intentions of doing these updates until things in my life (which are all good, by the way) have changed. I know that DJ has personal ongoings as well, as he took the GNOME ticket a *long* time ago, but there's been no development. I fully understand. I cannot promise that I can contribute to BLFS development, but I would love to stay on as Editor. I review each post to -book. I comment when necessary. In the regard of pure Editor, I believe I can handle that role, but some of you may look at the Editor should also be a contributor as well. I'm willing to discuss my role as Editor of the book, if there is concern in the community. Again, I cannot promise that I can contribute as an active developer. I will try and recruit as many new editors as possible. Again, I'd love to stay on in the role of Editor. I can review each post to -book, and I can do the release tasks, should we ever release another version. I hope that we do. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.25] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 17:04:00 up 8 days, 5:32, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.00, 0.00 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
