Randy McMurchy schrieb: > CC'ing BLFS-Support as this thread is more appropriate there, please > respond in that forum. Thanks.
i put it to -dev as the update was in dev. the current stable book doesn't have the problem. > Tobias Gasser wrote these words on 07/25/09 18:13 CST: >> mod_ruby-1.3.0 states "supported ruby 1.9 experimentally" > > I don't use Ruby so I cannot help any. However, what did Google spit > out? I'm trying to move this thread to -support as mod_ruby is not > a BLFS program and trying to support it does not really fit the mold > of this development forum. google does not really help. depending on the search-criteria you either get nothing or pages of unusefull statements... sorry, i didn't remember mod_ruby was not in blfs. but using apache and ruby will probably lead to mod_ruby. as mod_ruby is not covered in the book, just forget about my noise and keep on with updateing the book (incredibly how many updates are done today!). my problem can wait! currently i don't even consider it as a problem, as i just stick with ruby 1.8.7 for the moment as i have nothing running which would require to update to 1.9. > I'll try and help out over in -support. thanks for your help. but as mentionned, for me it is not urgent at all!! i just wanted to give my feedback about the ticket 2905 (ruby update) maybe a little hint on the ruby page about this mod_ruby problem might help anybody running into the same problem. tobias -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
