[email protected] wrote: > I understand why the version BLFS is often behind LFS. However, I do > think the "one or two months" BLFS statement should be changed as it > hurts credibility.
OK, done. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
