2009/12/21 Hops Error, Line 21, alcoholi.c > but in case it fails (or busybox still fails to locate anything on its > own or I get a wild hair) and I want to just use my clfs toolchain > instead, how compatible are the BLFS instructions with CLFS?
Compatability is primarily a question of using sufficiently new versions of the packages (to get past the usual c++ "you can't do that now!" issues), and searching for solutions (patches, etc) when things do break - exactly the same as using LFS-dev as the host. I've used essentially the same commands to build non-multilib systems on both LFS and CLFS, and where a package is in BLFS I usually mostly follow the instructions there. Using busybox might cause issues, it really depends on the packages you are trying to build. ĸen -- After tragedy, and farce, "OMG poneys!" -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
