On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote: > stosss wrote: > >> I am not complaining. I am simply asking. > > Sometimes its hard to interpret words when they are only written.
Yes, that is the problem with written communication. > My interpretation of your words was a complaint. It may not have been > your intent. > >> volunteer project. I am not expecting you to do things as though you >> have to. I am willing to jump in and help. I am sorry if you have >> taken offense. > > There is no offense taken. Perhaps you interpreted some of our written > words in a way not intended. > >> again I apologies. > > OK, but I don't really think that's necessary. > >> There really are some areas that could be improved. > > That's always true, but what those improvements would be will differ > from person to person. It becomes an opinion. True > I think that the vast majority of successful LFS builders do just fine > with the book the way it is. However we will still try to improve it. Yes, people who are determined to figure things out do go on to build a workable system. I did once I understood the mind set or concept of the way the book was written. If I have a good point of reference and understand the rules/structure/guide or whatever, I can get from the beginning to the end. Its when I can't get that known good point of reference that I get all messed up. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
