On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 10:27 +0000, Andrew Benton wrote: > I'm surprised that git couldn't be configured to only track the > current files.
Why surprised? That's the fundamental purpose of a version control system, to keep track of *every* version that's been committed to it. If it only kept the current files, how could you revert to a previous commit? > I've decided to use a combination of git (to track the build scripts) > and to distribute everything else I'll use rsync. Yes, that makes more sense for this problem. Git is a good choice for tracking revisions to your scripts (I use it for that myself), but very much the wrong tool for distributing tarballs across a network. Simon.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
