On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 14:57 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > That doesn't make sense. Both dircolors and ls are from coreutils. If > you use the same version of coreutils to generate /etc/dircolors, then > ls should understand it. > > On a recent LFS system, /etc/dircolors does not have an hl prefix. Even > checking back to an old copy of dircolors (binary and data file) > generated Nov 2005, there is no hl prefix. > > -- Bruce
Hmmmmmm ... but I do get the message: root [ /etc ]# ls >> ls: unrecognized prefix: hl >> ls: unparsable value for LS_COLORS environment variable with lfs 6.4 (coreutils-6.12). Bruce can you explain this? Is lfs 6.4 "too old"? Could it be an error, coming from wrong file right settings? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
