On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 04:30:10PM +0000, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 03:24:01PM +0000, Ken Moffat wrote: > > My understanding is that the patch used for 1.5.20 had come from > > mutt development, and is included in what ships for 1.5.21. If you > > disagree, please try applying the 1.5.20 source to 1.5.21. > I meant, ... please try applying the 1.5.20 *patch* to 1.5.21 > > ĸen > -- > das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page
I looked at the 1.5.20 patch and it did say it's origin was upstream. Looking at the patch, I don't think I needed for my mail setup anyway. I tried 1.5.21 with no patch and it seemed to work fine other than some issues with new mail notification which may be due to changed configuration options or something, but I don't have to time to sort it out now and have reverted to 1.5.20 till I get BLFS built. What I mean't by missing was that instructions tell me to install a patch that doesn't seem to exist. You and the other editors have done a great job updating BLFS and your efforts are appreciated. Thanks, --- Mike H.---- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
