On 04/19/2011 03:08 PM, luxInteg wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 April 2011 01:14:04 DJ Lucas wrote:
>
>> I honestly don't know. I didn't think it was not possible to *build* it
Ugh...that should have read: "I didn't think it was possible..."
>> without GTK, but the java binary doesn't link to GTK+ libraries
>> directly, and certainly runs without them handy. My guess is that
>> they've removed anything requiring GTK libs and packaged it up. I've
>
> I MAY have got lucky wit jdk-1.7 My build now ends like this
>
> -- Build times ----------
> Target all_product_build
> Start 2011-04-19 15:13:27
> End 2011-04-19 15:39:23
> 00:02:26 corba
> 00:07:53 hotspot
> 00:00:30 jaxp
> 00:00:34 jaxws
> 00:13:40 jdk
> 00:00:53 langtools
> 00:25:56 TOTAL
>
> I then copied the j2sdk image and it seems to be working. I set the copied
> location as ${JAVA_HOME}. I executed ${JAVA_HOME}/bin/java -version and it
> responded. And ant is no longer reporing errors. Incidently I tried
> compiling postgresql-jdbc connector and it failed. Ant was built with
> jdk-1.6 so is it . worth rebuilding ant with openjdk-1.7?
>
>
Is there something wrong with using the pre-compiled 64bit icedtea6
builds I have in the book? Not that I want to deter you from testing,
but I'd be concerned about stability initially as OpenJDK7 is still
experimental and there have been a lot of changes to the platform
between OpenJDK6 and OpenJDK7.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
