Em 22-07-2011 15:27, Jeremy Henty escreveu: >Fernando Oliveira wrote: > > >Re: LFS 6.5, 6.7, 6.8 >> >>Hi, >> >>Upgrade to iptables-1.4.11 generated a problem of missing some >>libraries, so iptables could not run. >> >>However, trying iptables-1.4.11.1, adding "--enable-libipq" to BLFS >>configure options, it works fine (so should my previous 1.4.11 >>attempt). >> > >That is strange! I built iptables-1.4.11.1 on LFS 6.5 with no >--enable-libipq . The only libipq on my system is the one included in >the iptables source. I wonder why I didn't have the same problems as >you did. > >Regards, > >Jeremy Henty >
Hi , Jeremy, Thanks for the reply. Strange it is. Following your post, I tried without "--enable-libipq" only in LFS6.8, and the executable worked. Just to be safe, I reinstalled with "--enable-libipq" again. Just to be clear, Yesterday, the installations of 1.4.11 and 1.4.11.1 were successful, but running 1.4.11 was not (without "--enable-libipq). In order to test, I rebooted all three machines, and was badly surprised: ssh from another host I use with cssh could not find the route to any of them. In each, sudo iptables -L -n gave me an empty table, with DROP for all chains. I tried to run a BLFS based rc.iptables script defining all rules again, without success, getting the message of wrong *6* libraries ... should be *6* (I believe something related to ipv4 and 6). Unfortunately (or fortunately?) I cannot reproduce this error any more. Your answer made me get the surprise I cited above, which is very important for me, although I do no yet understand what is happening with my three LFS's, because now I am warned that something seems to be wrong with them. Thank you very much, again. []s, Fernando de Oliveira Natal, RN, BRAZIL -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
