----- Mensagem original ----- > De: Fernando de Oliveira <[email protected]> > Para: BLFS Support List <[email protected]> > Cc: > Enviadas: Sábado, 23 de Julho de 2011 15:44 > Assunto: Re: paco >
... > ----- Mensagem original ----- >> De: Lars Bamberger <[email protected]> >> Para: [email protected] >> Cc: >> Enviadas: Sábado, 23 de Julho de 2011 13:35 >> Assunto: Re: paco >> >> On 23.07.2011 01:24, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: ... >>> $ sudo paco -rx --batch iptables ... >> I have paco-2.0.9 and the option 'x' does not exist in the >> documentation. (Typo?) > No, this can be found in the bottom of the page > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/downloads/files/paco.txt > or > http://paco.sourceforge.net/doc/lfs_hint.txt ... > ===================================================================== > > 3. Examples > =========== > ... 4) To remove all versions of the package boofar, without asking for > confirmation: paco -rx --batch boofar > ===================================================================== > > > In that page, we have > ===================================================================== > General options: > ... > | -x, --expand Expand the command line package names. > ===================================================================== > The practical effect, in my use, was that it did not ask for confirmation, > before trying to remove, which is better for scripting. Wrong I was. Checking this statement with and without -x and with and without --bash, I found, moments ago, that: -x: seems not having any effect, i.e., ignored, but I cannot be completely sure. --batch: good for avoiding interaction in scripting (this is sure). []s, Fernando de Oliveira Natal, RN, BRAZIL -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
