On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:00:48AM +0000, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > If verifying keys means I need to create my own key, [...] > > It doesn't. For years I have used GPG/GPG2 to verify keys and I have > never told it to trust my key or anyone else's. The downside is that > GPG will complain every time that it can't trust the identity of the > keyholder even though it has verified that the file was signed with > the key. If you can tolerate that noise then you can use GPG to > verify signatures without worrying about trust. > > Regards, > > Jeremy Henty
Thanks. Based on the mess it makes of mutt's display in rxvt-unicode (when I read past a signed message, the top and bottom of the screen contain text from previous mail's headers / errors, unless I go back to the list of messages ), I don't think I can tolerate that noise. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
