--- Em dom, 20/11/11, Simon Geard <[email protected]> escreveu: > De: Simon Geard <[email protected]> > Assunto: Re: [blfs-support] Linux-PAM-1.1.3 and LFS 7.0 > Para: [email protected] > Data: Domingo, 20 de Novembro de 2011, 6:17 > On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 10:43 -0800, > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > I do not mind about the WARNING and do no sign. In the > beginning, I > > searched about this and the conclusion was that if > someone posted > > signatures with wrong intentions it would be spotted, > so I waited one > > day and then, trusted it. > > My attitude is that if a package is signed with a key that > I've not > previously seen, I put the key ID into Google and see what > comes back. > Mostly, I'm looking for hits on the project's mailing > lists, indicating > that the key belongs to one of the maintainers... > > > I believe they are trustable (if there is this word in > English). > > There is now... :) That said, "trustworthy" is the correct > English word. > > Simon.
Thank you, Simon. []s, Fernando de Oliveira Natal, RN, BRAZIL -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
