On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:27:56PM +1300, Simon Geard wrote: > On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 00:14 +0000, Ken Moffat wrote: > > or perhaps upower actually needs pm-utils at runtime, even on a > > desktop ? > > I wouldn't rule it out. A desktop might not have a battery, but it's > still eligible to be suspended/hibernated, no different to any laptop in > that regard. > > Simon.
Tried it, managed to suspend but not to resume (fortunately I've commented out the >/dev/null in the checkfs bootscript), but it doesn't make any difference - gnome-power-stats still can't get processor wakeups per second. Oh well. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
