On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 07:52:27 +0000 Martins Gulbis <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > I am having problems building pkg-config-0.26. The following is the > output when I try a make: > > make all-recursive > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/martins/pkg-config-0.26' > Making all in popt > make[2]: Entering directory `/home/martins/pkg-config-0.26/popt' > make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. > make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/martins/pkg-config-0.26/popt' > Making all in . > make[2]: Entering directory `/home/martins/pkg-config-0.26' > /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -g -Wall -O2 -g -O2 -o > pkg-config pkg.o parse.o main.o lglib-2.0 popt/libpopt.la > libtool: link: gcc -g -Wall -O2 -g -O2 -o pkg-config pkg.o parse.o > main.o lglib-2.0 popt/.libs/libpopt.a > gcc: error: lglib-2.0: No such file or directory > make[2]: *** [pkg-config] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/martins/pkg-config-0.26' > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/martins/pkg-config-0.26' > make: *** [all] Error 2 > > As you can see, it cannot find lglib-2.0, the glib-2.0 library. The > makefile was created with the following configure command: > > GLIB_LIBS=-lglib-2.0 GLIB_CFLAGS=-I/usr/include/glib-2.0 \ > ./configure --prefix=/usr > > > I noticed that the actual name of the library file in /usr/lib is > libglib-2.0, so I tried changing GLIBS_LIB in the above to libglib-2.0 > and to libglib-2.0.a which had the same results. From looking at the > makefile I am having a hard time trying to figure out where it is > looking for library files. I think that Libtool is being used for > things like that, but not sure. If gcc is trying to link to -lglib-2.0 the library should be called libglib-2.0.so How did yours not get the .so at the end? Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
