I changed the bootscript recently (4th April) after 'Crider' reported a problem with the sequence and provided a patch to correct it. Does that version not work for you ?
ĸen On 17/04/2012, Walter Webb <[email protected]> wrote: > For the last few days, I have had the "getfh failed: Function not >> implemented" >> problem. I finally found it to be a nfs-server problem. /proc/fs/nfsd >> may be mounted before rpc.nfsd is started. If it has not been mounted, >> it will be mounted when rpc.nfsd is started. In either case, it will not >> be >> unmounted when nfs-server is stopped unless with an explicit umount. >> When rpc.mountd is started without /proc/fs/nfsd being mounted, that is >> when the filesystems are not successfully exported. >> >> If the umount is not executed when nfs-server is stopped, rpc.mountd will >> work when it is restarted. >> >> It shouldn't have taken me days to figure this out. Several LFS >> versions ago, >> I had to rearrange the starting sequence. I thought it was to get the >> mount >> before rpc.nfsd, but I tested it on LFS 6.7 that I still have; it's >> rpc.mountd. >> Maybe that's why nobody believed me. >> >> > I forgot to mention that the old symptoms were that the crossmnt and > nohide options > did not work. > > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > -- After tragedy, and farce, "OMG poneys!" -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
