Ken Moffat wrote: > Sorry for being despondent on this, it's good software, but their > release process sucks rocks, at least for people using linux. Maybe > it builds better on windows, where spaces in directory names are > expected, or on OSX. > I didn't find it easy to build on Windows, at least not when you wanted the PerlMagick part working as well. Just wondering if it would be any easier to use graphicsmagick in place of imagemagick. I noticed Debian adds a compatible layer so programs think they're calling imagemagick even though graphicsmagick is being used.
Sincerely, Laura http://www.distasis.com/cpp
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
