On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 02:06:19AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 01:15:06AM +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
> > 
> > I use the Elementary Icon Theme
> > http://gnome-look.org/content/show.php/Elementary+Icon?content=150749
> > But now I come to look at it I think I've edited the index.theme a
> > little so that it has:
> > Inherits=oxygen-refit-2,hicolor
> > So maybe it's inheriting the icons that Midori is asking for from
> > oxygen-refit-2?
> > http://gnome-look.org/content/show.php/Oxygen+Refit+2?content=79756
> > 
> > Andy
> 
>  Thanks.  I've not see an Inherits line before.  I'll take a look at
> those two themes.  Later.
> 
 I installed oxygen-refit-2 and ran gtk-update-icon-cache, but it
didn't help.  Elementary has icons for most of the missing names, but
only as .svg - and it inherits gnome,hicolor.

 At that point, I wasn't sure if I could use svg icons [ getting
confused by something else I'm doing! ] so I googled for some of the
other missing icons : turns out several of them are symlinks,
installed by gnome-icon-theme.  I had another look at what was
installed by gnome and they *are* there as .png.  Tried setting
the theme to gnome, and then GNOME, no change.  Installed elementary
anyway, ran gtk-update-icon-cache, changed the theme to elementary.
Still no joy.

 During that google session, I found a recent thread for some
embedded distro talking about these missing icons, not found even
after they were copied into a theme, and segfaults (on arm, I think).
I suspect a bug in 0.4.6's icon handling.

 It is usable with the '[x]' missing-icon icons, and provides
tooltips in English - for me that is adequate for the moment.
There is a maybe-related bug (at launchpad!) marked as low priority,
I get the impression that using commonly-installed icons is not a
design priority.  Giving up on this one for now.

ĸen
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to