Paul Kimbrel wrote:
> I noticed that the development version of BLFS does not appear to have
> xinetd in the server section anymore. Has that been specifically removed
> the LFS instructions?
Yes.
> The "TCP Wrappers" still have instructions for adding configuration to
> inetd, so I was wondering if xinetd would be added back or if there was a
> reason that it was removed?
{x,}inetd not useful in a modern environment. tcpwrappers would be
removed too except that many legacy applications still use the library.
Note that tcpwrappers has not been updated since 1997.
You are right that the inetd instructions in the tcpwrappers section
should be removed.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
