On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 05:29:33PM +0530, James Pinto wrote: > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Fernando de Oliveira > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > --- Em seg, 3/12/12, James Pinto <[email protected]> escreveu: > > > > > dpkg -i apt_0.9.7.6_i386.deb > > > (Reading database ... 1021 files and directories currently > > installed.) > > > Preparing to replace apt 0.9.7.6 (using apt_0.9.7.6_i386.deb) ... > > > Unpacking replacement apt ... > > > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of apt: > > > apt depends on libapt-pkg4.12 (>= 0.9.7.6); however: > > > Package libapt-pkg4.12 is not installed. > > > apt depends on libc6 (>= 2.4); however: > > > Package libc6 is not installed.
I don't think you understand what you are doing! For the dependency on libapt-pkg, it is possible that things have changed in the four years since the hint was written. You might need to build and install libapt-pkg first, as well as add it to the status file. That's just a guess, I now have no interest in the details of dpkg, nor of binary package installs. The apparently unmet dependency on libc6, however, suggests that you haven't got a correct entry in the status file. The example attached to the hint is probably out of date on the debian side, and certainly the LFS versions are *old*, but your entry for libc6-dev [ 2.5.1 in the attachment ] ought to match >= 2.4. This is *nothing* to do with symlinks. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
