On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 01:14:57AM +0100, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'd like to know how the LFS community sees Gentoo. Is it a distro
> similar to LFS, but with a package manager? Is it far from the books? So
> much patched? Can I have interactions between the 2 projects and help
> one with another (i.e. using for example gentoo rules to suggest blfs
> instructions)?
> 
> Thanks for your answer. My purpose: having a nearly-lfs, but with sOme
> work done by other, to help easily lfs and the project, but not
> installing/removing everything by hand.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
 In many ways, it is just another distro.  Yes, they build most
things from source (there are options for things like binary
firefox, although they also have instructions for from-source), but
some of their infrastructure is quite different ( the last time I
looked, gcc seemed to be quite a bit older than we were using, which
means it isn't (at the moment) a useful place to find patches for
errors triggered by a new version of gcc, and also ISTR they prefer
Python3 - obviously, with overrides to force Python2 for many desktop
packages :)

 For me, their USE flags are not worth learning, but YMMV.  I say
that as a user of my own scripts : for some packages, I do a DESTDIR
build _before_ deciding what options to use, for others I just drop
it into my build and (if it builds!) fix it up later for things like
avoiding static libraries - in any case, ny scripts will do their
best to make static libs inaccessible :)  Other people care
more about things like the name/location of documentation
directories (/usr/share/doc/foo-x.y.z but I'll put up with
/usr/share/foo or even /usr/foo until I notice it).

 I do find that gentoo sometimes have fixes for problems that I
encounter, and I rely on them to indicate which versions of certain
packages I should try (e.g. x264 for use by current ffmpeg).

 But overall, I think their build instructions need to be looked at
package-by-package : often they have required dependencies which I
don't need.  Sometimes they install documentation which I hadn't
considered, and which might be useful in the book.

 OTOH, neither of us has enough contributors.  e.g. I fixed
epdfview in BLFS, but they have sent its ebuild to /dev/null.  So
I'm sure that there are certain things we can each use from the
other.

ĸen
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to