> Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 16:11:42 -0400 > From: "Cliff McDiarmid" <[email protected]> > To: "akhiezer" <[email protected]>, > "BLFS Support List" > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Autofs problem on LFS7.2 > . . > Just to say that my '/etc/auto.testautomount' always had permissions 644. > In fact autofs-5.0.7 installs permissions 644 to the 'auto.master' file from > the outset, at least here. Sorry if i gave the wrong impression originally. >
Eh? 'Always'? Your first sentence there talks about '/etc/auto.testautomount'; and the second sentence seems to be trying to reinforce the first, but is talking about 'auto.master', which of course is a different file. Am not clear what you're meaning; apols if/that am being a bit dumb. Taking it at face value, I'd ask: what about: ---- > Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 05:32:50 -0400 > From: "Cliff McDiarmid" <[email protected]> > To: "akhiezer" <[email protected]>, > "BLFS Support List" > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Autofs problem on LFS7.2 > . . > $ \ls -laF /etc/auto.master /etc/auto.testautomount > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 171 Mar 9 18:06 /etc/auto.master > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 43 Mar 25 21:08 /etc/auto.testautomount* > $ . . ---- How was that output generated then? It shows that /etc/auto.master has 0644, yes: but /etc/auto.testautomount is shown clearly to have, at least at that point, 0755 . > > > As for 'reason 1)': per earlier note today, one would really want to do the . . > You are right of course. This needs doing and I will try it in the near > future and get back. This thread just won't lay down. > Well, I wouldn't necessarily feel _obliged_ to do it; but if you do then great. I might also manage to do it as a side-light on a new build here, soon-ish. rgds, akh -- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
