On 04/26/2013 05:45 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
>   Sorry, can't find the previous discussion, not sure if it was here
> or on -dev.
>
>   In my last build (LFS-7.3, a couple of weeks ago) I renamed all .la
> files in /usr/lib to .la.hidden and things seemed fine.  For my
> current build (LFS-svn) I'm also renaming all .la files in
> subdirectories - in case that makes a difference.
>
>   I've just failed to build openjade:
>
> make[2]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libosp.la', needed by
> `openjade'.  Stop.
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/scratch/working/openjade-1.3.2/jade'
> make[1]: *** [jade] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/scratch/working/openjade-1.3.2'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
>
>   Fortunately, I didn't delete the .la file.
>
>   Weird.
>
> ĸen
>

IIRC, that's the only package which *needs* .la file at build time - it 
is hardcoded in makefile. Simple sed fixes that.
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to