On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 01:31:33AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 07:06:55PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote: > > On 8/24/2013 7:03 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 06:52:29PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote: > > >> Built elfutils-0.156 on the latest SVN, I built book from svn pulled > > >> this morning. > > >> Here is the test results > > >> > > >> ============================================================================ > > >> Testsuite summary for elfutils 0.156 > > >> ============================================================================ > > >> # TOTAL: 96 > > >> # PASS: 96 > > > You're using Mesa-9.2-rc ? > > > > No I have not tested against mesa as I am building/running a server for > > web/mail (exim and dovecot)/dns/ntp/nntp/file serving > > Oh well. At least it builds and passes the tests. > I've tagged it. For reference, I don't believe that passing its own tests is normally an adequate test (nor that failing tests means a package doesn't work), but in this case nothing else currently uses it, and anyway it did allow me to build the Mesa 9.2 branch on my other box : I'd forgotten about that. Thanks.
ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, dieses Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
