Richard Melville wrote: > Does anybody have any experience of noshell as a replacement for /bin/false > and /dev/null? I realise that it's quite old, but is it still useful as a > more secure way of creating a user with no login shell? > > Fish.com, together with the titan hardening package, seems to have morphed > into a a tropical fish website, but the noshell source code is still > available from Debian.
I'm unaware why noshell would be an advantage over /bin/false. What does it do that is needed? -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
