Walter P. Little wrote: > For gst-plugins-bad-0.10.23 ( > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/stable/multimedia/gst-plugins-bad.html), > I just noticed that FAAC-1.28 is listed both in "recommended" and > "optional." Seems like it should just be in one of the categories (perhaps > it got promoted to recommended at some point?). Anyway, not a big deal by > any stretch, just thought I would let the maintainers know.
Thanks for pointing that out. Fixed. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
